On 18 Jul 2000 16:37:26 GMT, lechatafaime@aol.comLeNoSpam (Le Chat A Faime) wrote:

>I think the implications being made about Bob Minton and the Nigeria business
>are irrelevant and should not be mentioned on this ng.

That's funny. Your cult thought they were extremely relevant ~before~ they included the facts that Scientology through PIs operating under aliases actually wrote the papers that claimed to expose criminal acts by Bob.

Now that the facts are coming out, and it is clear that this is a Scientology operation, complete with the standard Scientology ~lies~, now with the added bonus of some Tone -8.0 hiding on the part of those originally alleging these things, you think it's ~not~ appropriate here?

What has changed? Why when it was allegations of Bob doing wrong was it appropriate for alt.religion.scientology, and now that it has turned into a case of Scientology lying and performing illegal and immoral acts is it suddenly ~not~ appropriate in this newsgroup? Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I would have thought that the reverse was the case. Could you clarify that one for me?

- Brent

From the CWPD Investigation files: Statement of Annie Mora: "Even for us it's a weird thing." pg 109